${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}
Schedule an initial consultation with Lackawanna County criminal defense attorney Bernard J. Brown
570-281-8117
570-281-8117
View Our Practice Areas

Supreme Court rules on Pennsylvania sex offender registry

A recent ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court set a precedent for the proper application of the Pennsylvania Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), a law passed in 2012 to strengthen reporting requirements for sex offenders. In Pennsylvania v. Muniz, the Court held that SORNA's registration provisions constitute punishment, the retroactive application of which would violate the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions' ex post facto clauses. Therefore, SORNA may not be retroactively applied to offenders who committed sex crimes, prior to its enactment.

Prior to the enactment, offenders were required to report for either 10 years or life. SORNA changed those requirements to the tier system, under which, offenders are placed in one of three tiers, with corresponding registration times of 15 years, 25 years or a lifetime.

Some convicted sex offenders who were previously required to register for 10 years were then subjected to lifetime registration under SORNA, based on their underlying offense. After the court's ruling, these reclassified offenders may now request a return to the 10-year registration period or removed from the registry completely.

In Pennsylvania v. Muniz, the defendant was convicted of indecent assault in 2007, and at that time, he was required to comply with Megan's Law III, which stated that the defendant must register as a sex offender with the Pennsylvania State Police for 10 years. However, the defendant absconded and was not apprehended until 2014, when the law changed to SORNA. Because the defendant was convicted of indecent assault of a person less than 13 years of age, he was categorized as a Tier III offender under SORNA and subject to lifetime registration requirements.

The court found, in part, that because the defendant would be required to appear in person at a

registration site four times a year for the remainder of his life, SORNA constitutes a direct restraint on the defendant and is therefore, punitive. The court held that SORNA, applied retroactively to the defendant, is unconstitutional under the ex post facto clauses of the U.S. and Pennsylvania Constitutions. This decision has broad implications regarding the applicability of sex offender registration requirements under SORNA and may result in the removal of many offenders from Pennsylvania's sex registry.

Source: York Dispatch, "Ruling raises questions about Pennsylvania sex offender registry's future," Mark Scolforo, July 24, 2017

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
msg iconEmail Us For a Response

Contact Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy